Legal Risks of Ignoring Accessibility in Higher Education
Accessibility in education ensures that all students, regardless of disabilities, can access and benefit from academic resources, including online courses, digital learning materials and campus facilities.
Failing to provide accessible education not only violates laws but also undermines an institution’s commitment to equity and inclusion. Moreover, as online and blended learning become central to higher education, digital accessibility takes on unprecedented importance.
Accessibility in higher education is not just a moral imperative but a legal requirement. With an increasing emphasis on inclusive education, institutions in the United States, European Union (EU), and the United Kingdom (UK) face significant legal, financial, and reputational risks if they fail to meet accessibility standards. In this blog we will look at the legal landscape, the technical requirements for compliance and what lies ahead in 2025 and beyond.
Legal Frameworks Governing Accessibility in Education
United States
- Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA):
- Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act:
- Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act:
European Union
- European Accessibility Act (EAA):
- Web Accessibility Directive (WAD):
United Kingdom
- Equality Act 2010:
- Public Sector Bodies (Websites and Mobile Applications) Accessibility Regulations 2018:
- Office for Students (OfS) Guidelines:
Risks of Non-Compliance with Accessibility Laws
Ignoring accessibility can lead to severe consequences:
1. Financial Penalties
Non-compliance with accessibility laws like the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in the U.S. or the Equality Act in the UK can result in hefty fines and lawsuits. Fines can range from thousands to millions of dollars depending on the scope of violations. In the EU non-compliance penalties vary by country but often amount to hundreds of thousands of euros.
Financial repercussions go beyond initial fines: ongoing legal battles, attorney fees, and settlement payouts can strain an institution’s budget and divert funds from core academic initiatives.
2. Loss of Funding
Institutions that receive federal or government funding are subject to stringent accessibility regulations under laws like Section 504 and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act in the U.S. or similar frameworks in the EU and UK. Failing to comply with these laws can render institutions ineligible for federal financial aid programs, research grants, or public funding. Such consequences force institutions to implement program cuts and reduced services for all students.
The loss of funding not only disrupts institutional operations but can also jeopardize financial aid packages for students who rely on government assistance, potentially reducing enrollment and accessibility to education.
3. Damage to Reputation
Legal action related to accessibility invariably attracts media coverage, which can tarnish an institution’s public image. Negative coverage can deter partnerships with corporations and donors who prioritize diversity and inclusion, further eroding institutional support. Parents, students, and advocacy groups may question the institution’s commitment to inclusivity and equality, leading to a decline in applications from students with disabilities and their allies.
Once reputation is damaged, rebuilding trust takes years, often requiring costly PR campaigns and substantial changes to institutional practices.
4. Operational Disruptions
Addressing accessibility non-compliance is rarely a quick fix. Universities may need to overhaul their digital platforms, update course materials and invest in staff training. Re-engineering Learning Management Systems (LMS), captioning thousands of videos, or redesigning websites to meet WCAG standards requires technical expertise and funding.
When legal action mandates immediate remediation, institutions are required to do all the above under tight deadlines, creating significant operational hurdles.Faculty and administrative staff may find themselves burdened with additional responsibilities, from content adaptation to compliance reporting. These operational disruptions often divert resources from ongoing educational programs, affecting the overall quality of education and student satisfaction.
How Institutions Can Prevent Accessibility Non-Compliance
- Conduct Accessibility Audits: Regularly review digital content and platforms to identify gaps.
- Invest in Training: Equip faculty and staff with the knowledge to create accessible materials.
- Adopt Accessible Technologies: Partner with LMS providers and software developers that prioritize accessibility.
- Engage Students: Include students with disabilities in testing and feedback processes to ensure practical usability.
- Stay Informed: Monitor changes in laws and standards to remain compliant.
Looking Head - 2025 and Beyond
1. Increased Scrutiny
Governments and regulatory bodies are expected to ramp up compliance checks, particularly for institutions offering online and hybrid learning programs. Such institutions may face heightened scrutiny over online course materials, digital libraries and third-party tools used for eLearning. Federal agencies like the U.S. Department of Education are also likely to mandate periodic accessibility audits for Learning Management Systems (LMS) and digital resources.
2. Expansion of Standards
Accessibility guidelines like the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) will continue to evolve, incorporating advancements in technology. Updates to WCAG are likely to address accessibility for virtual reality (VR) classrooms, augmented reality (AR) educational tools, and 3D simulations. Countries in the EU and UK are expected to enhance their national standards in alignment with global updates, such as mandating compliance for immersive content platforms in higher education.
Institutions will need to work closely with technologists, instructional designers and legal experts to stay ahead of these expanding standards.
3. Focus on Inclusive Design
Accessibility will evolve from being a legal requirement to a central design philosophy, emphasizing usability for all students from the outset. Institutions will increasingly adopt Universal Design for Learning (UDL) frameworks to ensure their programs meet the needs of all learners, including those with disabilities. This will include flexible learning materials, multiple means of engagement, and customizable assessments.
Higher education software providers will integrate accessibility tools directly into LMS platforms, allowing educators to create compliant content without requiring advanced technical expertise.
Conclusion: Embracing Accessibility is Non-Negotiable
Accessibility in higher education is not optional—it’s a legal and ethical necessity. Beyond compliance, embracing accessibility fosters an inclusive learning environment, enriches educational experiences, and prepares institutions for a diverse student population.
By proactively addressing accessibility, higher education institutions can avoid legal pitfalls while demonstrating a commitment to equity, innovation, and excellence in education.
Leave a comment